Business RadioX ®

  • Home
  • Business RadioX ® Communities
    • Southeast
      • Alabama
        • Birmingham
      • Florida
        • Orlando
        • Pensacola
        • South Florida
        • Tampa
        • Tallahassee
      • Georgia
        • Atlanta
        • Cherokee
        • Forsyth
        • Greater Perimeter
        • Gwinnett
        • North Fulton
        • North Georgia
        • Northeast Georgia
        • Rome
        • Savannah
      • Louisiana
        • New Orleans
      • North Carolina
        • Charlotte
        • Raleigh
      • Tennessee
        • Chattanooga
        • Nashville
      • Virginia
        • Richmond
    • South Central
      • Arkansas
        • Northwest Arkansas
    • Midwest
      • Illinois
        • Chicago
      • Michigan
        • Detroit
      • Minnesota
        • Minneapolis St. Paul
      • Missouri
        • St. Louis
      • Ohio
        • Cleveland
        • Columbus
        • Dayton
    • Southwest
      • Arizona
        • Phoenix
        • Tucson
        • Valley
      • Texas
        • Austin
        • Dallas
        • Houston
    • West
      • California
        • Bay Area
        • LA
        • Pasadena
      • Colorado
        • Denver
      • Hawaii
        • Oahu
  • FAQs
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our Audience
    • Why It Works
    • What People Are Saying
    • BRX in the News
  • Resources
    • BRX Pro Tips
    • B2B Marketing: The 4Rs
    • High Velocity Selling Habits
    • Why Most B2B Media Strategies Fail
    • 9 Reasons To Sponsor A Business RadioX ® Show
  • Partner With Us
  • Veteran Business RadioX ®

BRX Pro Tip: Are You Living a Resume Life or a Eulogy Life?

March 3, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: Are You Living a Resume Life or a Eulogy Life?
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: Are You Living a Resume Life or a Eulogy Life?

Stone Payton: Welcome back to Business RadioX Pro Tips, Stone Payton and Lee Kantor here with you. Lee, I thought this was an interesting question and probably one we should all be asking ourselves. Are you living a resume life or a eulogy life?

Lee Kantor: This is something that David Brooks, the author of the book The Second Mountain, talks about. He wrote about this concept, and it really kind of makes you think. He asked, are you living for your resume or are you living for your eulogy?

Lee Kantor: Your resume virtues are things that will get you ahead in your career. And, you know, these are your skills, these are the things you’ve accomplished, titles, deals you’ve closed, things like that. But your eulogy virtues are the things that people say about you at your funeral. Were you kind? Were you there for people? Did you make a difference in individual people’s lives or your community’s lives? Those are two different things.

Lee Kantor: And at some point in your life, you’re going to have to ask yourself, if someone was giving your eulogy today, what would they say? Are they going to be talking about how many deals you closed and what a wiz you were at PowerPoint, how much revenue you generated? Are they going to talk about how you showed up for people? And if you got too many things on your list that are about business, and deals, and money, and things and stuff, you might want to use that as kind of a gut check for how you’re building your life, and your business, and your relationships.

Lee Kantor: And the best part about this exercise is you don’t have to choose one or the other. You can build a successful business and you can be someone people genuinely want to remember and will remember. So, it’s not an either/or. It is an and. So remember, are you living a resume life or a eulogy life? David Brooks says you can do both.

BRX Pro Tip: Consistency is Better Than Perfection

March 2, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: Consistency is Better Than Perfection
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: Consistency is Better Than Perfection

Stone Payton: And we’re back with Business RadioX Pro Tips, Stone Payton and Lee Kantor here with you. Lee, anyone who taps into our work or certainly listens to me, they know I am no fan of perfection. To me, consistency is so much more important. What’s your take?

Lee Kantor: I think that if you’re aiming for perfection, you’re setting yourself up to fail. I think consistency is the much better path. Repetitions are so much better than just waiting for perfect. And the only way to achieve or get close to perfection is by just doing the thing more often.

Lee Kantor: There was a story I read recently where a teacher who teaches pottery, they divided their class into two groups. She told one group, you’ll get an A if you produce 50 pounds of pots. And she told the other group, all you have to do is produce one pot, if it’s great, you’ll get an A. And then at the end of the class, they looked at all the pots that were created, and most of the great pots came from the group that produced the 50 pounds of pots, not the group that just did one.

Lee Kantor: Because it’s so much harder to get good at something if you’re only doing it one time. So keep that in mind, you need repetition, you need practice. That’s how you’re going to learn. That’s how you’re going to get better. That’s how you’re going to know what works and what doesn’t. That way you can kind of double down on what’s working and you’re just going to get better faster if you would just give yourself some grace and just consistently do the work. Do the thing over and over, you will get better over time.

Lee Kantor: So this week, pick one thing you’re going to do consistently. A weekly email, a daily blog post, a monthly webinar, whatever it is, just set a goal of good enough. That’s the standard, good enough. Decide what that minimum bar of quality is, and just do it over and over and over. That’s your goal is more. Don’t wait for perfect. Schedule it. Put it on your calendar as non-negotiable time, and just make sure you’re doing the thing.

Lee Kantor: And done consistently beats perfect eventually. So done now is better than perfect later. Start showing up. Keep showing up. Keep doing the thing.

BRX Pro Tip: How to be a Better Teacher

February 27, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: How to be a Better Teacher
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: How to be a Better Teacher

Stone Payton: Welcome back to Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, I know in our work we find ourselves attempting to teach quite a bit, our studio partners, our clients, our community partners. What are some strategies and tactics to become a better teacher?

Lee Kantor: Well, here are some things that the better teachers do. Number one, they meet people where they are. They keep checking for understanding. They use examples and analogies. They let people practice and mess up in safe environments. So to do all those things, ask more questions than you answer. Instead of explaining everything, ask what do you think happens next? Why do you think we do it this way?

Lee Kantor: Make the person you’re teaching think through things. Make them have a deeper understanding of the why behind things. And then, give them the opportunity to teach it back. Let them teach somebody else, because a great way to learn something and to teach something is to allow that student to become the teacher. When they’re teaching it to somebody else, then you’ll see how much they understand. The better they can explain something to someone, that means that they have that depth of knowledge that you’re trying to transfer. So have them first explain it back to you in their own words, and then you’ll know if they got it or not. And then have them teach somebody else and watch them, and then you’ll see if they really understand what you’re explaining.

Lee Kantor: Always try to break, you know, big concepts into smaller chunks. Don’t try to teach everything at once. Do it incrementally. Pick one concept, make sure they got it, then move on to the next one. And the better you are at teaching, the stronger your team is going to become, and the less time you’re going to spend fixing their problems. And you’re going to have a stronger team, you’re going to have a better run organization when you have more people that kind of have that depth of knowledge that you have and that can explain it to others.

Lee Kantor: So, this is something that’s worth getting good at. So, invest some time in learning how to become a better teacher yourself.

BRX Pro Tip: Productive Mornings

February 26, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: Productive Mornings
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: Productive Mornings

Stone Payton: Welcome back to Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, what do you do to try to ensure that you’re going to have a productive morning?

Lee Kantor: I think the secret to productive mornings begin the night before. If you want to have a productive morning, you just can’t start thinking about it when the alarm goes off. You have to set yourself up for success the night before.

Lee Kantor: So, three things to do tonight before you go to bed. Number one, pick your top three priorities for tomorrow. Write them down so you know exactly what you’re attacking first thing in the morning.

Lee Kantor: Two, set out everything you need in order to execute those priorities. If you’re going to say I’m going to work out, then put your workout clothes. If you’re going to say you’re going to eat a healthy breakfast, then make sure that you got everything you need for the healthy breakfast. If it’s something about your work, make sure your workspace is ready to go. You want to remove all the friction or as much of the friction as possible from your morning routine, so you can just start. You don’t have to begin by setting yourself up. You want to just begin by beginning.

Lee Kantor: And number three, set a hard stop time for your distractions on your phone or on your screens, your iPad, or your laptop. Give yourself at least 30 minutes of wind down time so that you actually sleep well. Because the key to having a good night’s sleep is by setting yourself up for success in that regard, and that means turn off the screens and get yourself solid sleep. I think sleep is an underrated thing that people think they can just skimp on and get away with less and less. You have to have good quality sleep if you want to have a productive morning.

Lee Kantor: So, get organized. Protect your best energy for your best work. The night before is going to determine the morning, so set yourself up to win.

BRX Pro Tip: Ship Every Week

February 25, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: Ship Every Week
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: Ship Every Week

Stone Payton: And we’re back with Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, I’ve come to regard it as a Lee Mantra, but it wouldn’t surprise me if you picked it up from one of the folks that you really try to follow and learn from, but you’ve said it more than a few times, ship every week.

Lee Kantor: Yeah, I think you got to get into a rhythm, especially if you’re an entrepreneur, especially if you are building a business that you have to ship every week and you have to measure your KPIs as you iterate. Too many people are waiting until everything is perfect before they put something out there, and I think that is just a fundamental mistake.

Lee Kantor: I think a better approach is to ship something every week, measure what happened. It doesn’t have to be perfect. It just has to be out there where people can see it, they can respond to it or not. And then, you can take action based on what you learn.

Lee Kantor: So number one, decide what you’re going to ship this week. Is it a piece of content? Is it a new offer? Is it an outreach campaign? Whatever it is, it doesn’t matter. Just make sure it gets out there. Number two, pick one, two, three KPIs to measure. Are they going to be conversation started? Is it going to be response rate? Is it conversions? Is it engagement? It doesn’t matter what it is. Just get in the habit of doing this over and over. And then at the end of the week, look at your numbers, make one adjustment for next week.

Lee Kantor: And remember, as Stone always says, speed beats perfection. You need higher velocity. The faster you iterate, the faster you learn what actually works. And you can take that information and move forward in the next week. So, ship something this week.

Navigating Virtual Trust: Leveraging Emotional Intelligence for Business Growth

February 25, 2026 by angishields

SIP-James-Castleberry-Feature
Scaling in Public
Navigating Virtual Trust: Leveraging Emotional Intelligence for Business Growth
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Lee Kantor and Stone Payton, along with coach James Castleberry, explore how business founders and coaches can build stronger virtual relationships. They discuss interpreting emotional intelligence assessments, overcoming challenges of trust in remote environments, and leveraging personal strengths. The team experiments with new onboarding strategies, emphasizing visibility, empathy, and real-time collaboration. James offers practical advice on fostering connection and psychological safety online. 

LeaderEI-logo

James-CastleberryJames L. Castleberry is a retired U.S. military officer and the founder of Castleberry Coaching & Consulting and CEO of LeaderEI, a firm specializing in leadership development through emotional intelligence (EQ) strategies. With more than 25 years of leadership experience across the military, government, and private sectors, James helps organizations achieve measurable business results through customized coaching, training, and consulting solutions.

James is a recognized authority in the application of emotional intelligence in leadership, utilizing tools like EQ-i 2.0®, EQ360®, and MSCEIT® 2.0 to assess and develop emotionally intelligent leaders. In addition to serving executives and teams, he certifies HR professionals, consultants, and coaches to become EQ-i practitioners—building leadership pipelines focused on empathy, communication, and self-awareness.

In his conversation with Trisha, James reflected on his transition from military intelligence to executive coaching and discussed the critical role emotional intelligence plays in leading across generations and managing complex team dynamics. He highlighted the LeaderEI certification program, emphasizing how EQ can be learned and applied to improve leadership effectiveness, retention, and organizational culture. Known for his practical, research-backed, and people-first approach, James continues to impact leaders globally through in-person and virtual programs.

He holds certifications as a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR), Certified Executive Coach, and Master EQ-i Trainer, and is a graduate of Harvard’s Leadership Coaching Strategies program. Based in Florida, James lives out his values of humility, service, and sustainable leadership impact.

Connect with James on LinkedIn.

Episode Highlights

  • Leadership clarity and emotional intelligence (EQ 20 assessment)
  • Leveraging personal strengths in business growth
  • Challenges of building trust and intimacy in virtual environments
  • Importance of visibility and personal storytelling in virtual communication
  • Current onboarding and interview processes for new partners
  • Experimenting with joint virtual sessions to enhance relationship building
  • Balancing optimism with skepticism in client interactions
  • Strategies for fostering enthusiasm and addressing concerns in conversations
  • Streamlining processes to avoid overwhelming prospects
  • Commitment to continuous learning and refining engagement strategies

Transcript-iconThis transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix.

 

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: Broadcasting live from our flagship studio in Atlanta, Georgia. This is scaling in public. The next 100 Business RadioX markets, featuring founders Lee Kantor and Stone Payton, along with some of America’s top coaches, helping them grow the network with real strategy, real lessons, and real accountability all shared in public. To learn more about the proven system that turns podcast interviews into a perpetual prospecting pipeline through generosity, not gimmicks, go to Burks Intercom and download the free Business RadioX playbook. Now here’s your host.

Stone Payton: Welcome to another exciting and informative edition of addition of scaling in public. Lee Kantor Stone Payton here with you. Please join me in welcoming to the session our coach today, James Castleberry. How are you man?

James Castleberry: Doing great Stone. And thank you. Thank you both for having me this afternoon.

Stone Payton: Well, it’s our pleasure. All right, man. Help us grow this thing.

James Castleberry: All right, so basically, what we do is, is help with clarity. Wherever that clarity may go, wherever that clarity may take us. Sometimes it’s an individual leader and and how they interact with their teams. Sometimes it’s helping a team understand where their challenges may be and their strengths may be. And then aligning, uh, what we can from those strengths and from those challenges to whatever their, uh, strategic goals are, what their missions are to help them move forward. And so, uh, with us, this is a little different than, than most of what we do. You guys have already had debriefs concerning the QE 2.0. That is the, um, the valid and reliable assessment that we use and the tool that I use to help teams and, and executives grow. And so, uh, I guess I would like to understand a little bit about what your impressions were of your results.

Stone Payton: Uh, well, I can go first on, on that one. I wasn’t terribly surprised at the the highs and the lows, the the outliers, if you will. And I gotta say, I think if my wife read the report and I think I may give her a chance to read it, I don’t know that she would be surprised, uh, either. So, you know, it’s all for me. It’s good to self-reflect. Think about that. I try to be self-aware, but what I’m really thirsty for is, okay if this is my nature or this is my behavior pattern. Where and when and how do I need to adapt, do some things differently that will that will help us grow this business. You know, better and faster. So I’m I’m thirsty for that. That next step with this.

Lee Kantor: Yeah. I would agree with Stone in this regard. It was interesting to go through it. And it was uh, a lot of the results were things that I thought were, you know, pretty accurate. But then how do you take that next step of taking that information and that intelligence and making it work to help us achieve our goal of growing the network? Like, how can we, you know, amp up our strengths, either develop or hide our weaknesses? Uh, to help us get to the objective we have.

James Castleberry: Yeah. And so one of the things I do want to mention now, for those that are, um, are, um, accustomed to using B-level psychometrics is both Stone and Lee have consented to the use of this, uh, in coaching and, um, and so where we would normally keep this at a confidential level, they both, uh, have agreed to this and this, uh, scaling in public coaching forum. So I just wanted to make sure that that was out there so that our listeners understand that this is coming from a place of consent for their their mutual growth. And a.

Stone Payton: Good disclaimer. James, I don’t blame you. You don’t you don’t do a radio show out of everybody’s session.

James Castleberry: No, no, absolutely. Just just the opposite. Usually it’s one on one. Or if we’re talking about it in a group session, then everything is anonymous. And so, um, you know, these results are, are typically confidential. And then coaching sessions are typically confidential. And so this is uh, this is a little bit different forum that we’re using. And it’s the purpose uh, for you guys in scaling in public. And so based on your individual results and what you saw, um, as your strengths, how were you using those already to help you, uh, to scale the business?

Lee Kantor: I mean, I’ll take this first since, um, one of the outliers for me was, uh, interpersonal relationships. And this whole business was built and was created to shore up that side of my personality. I’m not a people person. Uh, I don’t get a lot of energy from, uh, being around people. I’m an introvert more than an extrovert. So I created this system and the Business RadioX platform to help myself, uh, have an easier path to meeting people and from maybe changing the frame of me seeking them out to them, wanting to be part of what I was doing. So the whole business is built basically on Probably the biggest outlier I had in the results of my assessment, which was interpersonal relationships.

James Castleberry: And how do you think that’s going for you, Lee? If that’s the whole reason that we’re into this and one of your reasons for it. Uh, what what steps have you made, uh, in improving this, that you’ve seen, uh, that, uh, that’s visible as a business result?

Lee Kantor: I mean, what has occurred as a business over the 20 years we’ve been doing this is that there has been people out there who have partnered with us and have, um, tried this on themselves and for a variety of reasons, not, uh, in fact, probably not. I would say the minority of them are introverts. The majority of the partners we have thus far are more extroverted, who see other ways to leverage the platform than what I initially did. But for me personally, I think that it has been validated that this is a great way to build more relationships faster with more of the right people. So from that standpoint, I think, um, it was it was doing exactly what I had set out to do.

James Castleberry: What do you still find challenging about it?

Lee Kantor: Um, what what is the it you’re referring to?

James Castleberry: Um, well, you you speak about being an introvert, and, uh, one of your other interviews, I, I heard, um, mention of. How do you get the same feeling in the studio that you can get virtually. And, you know, we deal this with, uh, with globalization. It’s one of my areas of study. And so we deal with this and and the way that people perceived virtually even their own emotional intelligence is a little bit different, because you can’t feel that, that same emotion research tells us we can feel emotions 6 to 10ft away. You can’t feel that as good virtually. So, um. What what are we doing? Uh, to be able to try to get that same feeling virtually out there in this platform that we, we otherwise might get if we’re in the studio in person.

Lee Kantor: Uh, that’s an area that we’re working on, is to try to create some sort of a virtual experience that can capture some of the magic that happens face to face in a studio. So that is an area that we haven’t figured out yet, and we’re working on to better create those that kind of level of intimacy and sharing and, um, the visceral feeling that occurs in a studio that just doesn’t occur as easily or as elegantly virtually.

James Castleberry: Yeah, I think there’s ways that you can do that. Most of that is wrapped around, um, uh uh, the, the the psychology of people feeling comfortable, uh, and and building that trust and understanding how you can build that trust. Um, virtually, I think.

Lee Kantor: So what are some examples? How how could you share some examples of ways that we might not be aware of or haven’t considered in order to build that level of intimacy and trust? Is there some things you’ve learned from doing your kind of work virtually, that maybe we could borrow and put into our playbook?

James Castleberry: Yeah, a lot of it is visibility, right? And we say, okay, we’re doing this virtually. Um, there is a difference in a meeting if people have their cameras on or if they don’t have their cameras on. And this can be challenging. But we read so much and we hear so much virtually from body language and people’s expressions and, and trying to understand, just like we would in person. We might not feel it the same way if we’re not in person, but, uh, that’s one, uh, method where we can really see it. I the advantage of being the intelligence field when I was in active duty. And so for years and years we had top secret, uh, teleconferences, and you could, uh, regardless of who you were talking to and how far away they were, um, you got a different feeling from that leader. Not not based on the typical things that we build trust on. Typically it’s consistency. It’s transparency. Um, but and professionalism, uh, all those things count too, in a virtual environment. But you can add to that in the way, um, that there’s you try to develop a personal connection and you keep that even if it’s virtually. And some of that’s understanding a little bit more about the people that you’re talking to. Uh, Stone, stone example of yours might be the the recent hunting trip that you talked about and just sharing a little bit. And you have to have your boundaries, but sharing a little bit of that personal background so that people can say, okay, he’s like me in this way, or he’s like me in that way, and that helps build those interpersonal relationships. Uh, it helps him understand that you have empathy. It helps them understand that if you do some of the same things, you might find some of the same things mutually satisfying. Um, and so, uh, for you, do you feel closer, even if it’s virtually, uh, stone, if you’re talking to someone online with, uh, if the camera is on, if the camera is off or if you relate a personal story.

Stone Payton: So would the camera on for me, like, uh, built into our core system anyway is often a pre-call to help someone get ready for a Business RadioX interview. And and of course, that’s the you know, the coaching version of that is, is a discovery call, which is one of the reasons this worked so well for coaches. But I have found in doing those pre calls that and I do some not with Cameron, like if I, if I’m out at the archery range and it’s a 430 afternoon call, I might not be on camera, but if I’m in the, in the office or in the local studio here, when you’re on camera, I can pick up on body signals. I think they can see my enthusiasm. So I think it does add a a layer of trust and does add to the dynamic more often than not. If, uh, if we’re on camera during those during those phone conversations. Yeah.

James Castleberry: Do y’all typically do those as a team together because they’re going to see you as a partnership taking this forward, do y’all typically do discovery calls together?

Stone Payton: Uh, no. Typically I’m doing the discovery calls okay.

Lee Kantor: But historically, before the pandemic, we would be together in person, right?

James Castleberry: Oh.

Lee Kantor: Virtual occurred beginning after the pandemic, when we had to go virtual when we no longer could meet in in the studio. We had to pivot to virtual. So that was the beginning of that of being on camera or not being on camera.

James Castleberry: So do you think there could be a difference? Uh, when you met in person, you both met in person instead? I think that’s what I’m hearing is that you both met in person, but, uh, most of the discovery calls now were done by, uh, Stone. Do you think there’s a difference in your comfort level and maybe a potential clients, um, comfort level with both of you? Um, when you participated together versus just a discovery call, being with one person.

Lee Kantor: Um, well, I, I do, I mean, I think it was more powerful when it was both of us together. Um, and I think it was more powerful in person, so. So, yeah, I agree that it was together was better than individually.

James Castleberry: So how how might you be able to maybe because this has been successful in the past, how might you be able to implement that, uh, to where, um, you, you can work toward? I’m not going to say it’s going to be the same as in the studio because you don’t feel that emotion, but, um, uh, could you see a way, uh, what might it look like if you were able to do those, uh, the same way, except. Except virtually now. So to hear from both of you.

Lee Kantor: At some point in the relationship, we do kind of join forces, but it hasn’t been on the initial call lately. I mean, how would you when do when do I typically get inserted into this stone?

Stone Payton: Um, more often than not. And again, this is with the scaling effort. As we’re talking to somebody. I’m just making a market up like San Diego. I might have that initial conversation with them, help them get prepared to come on a show. And then more often than not, there are some exceptions. Lee is the one that’s actually conducting the interview, so he’s building some rapport with them at that point. Um, although he’s probably not on camera during most of that, I suspect. And then, um, they schedule a follow up call to help them get the most out of their interview. And that’s usually with me. And then depending on the time of day and the day of the week, uh, you know, most of those would be on, uh, on camera. That’s the that’s the current methodology for trying to cultivate business and markets where we are not now at the local level, the way we’ve done it for 20 something years. It worked then, and it works now. I mean, that that recipe is, you know, locked and loaded. That’s a well baked process. It works. It always works. It never doesn’t work. But this going to markets where we don’t have physical representation yet and, um, trying to move a potential studio partner, uh, along that process. Um, we’re definitely struggling with that. And I think virtual is this virtual dynamic is is part of the challenge.

James Castleberry: Um.

Lee Kantor: So just to reiterate, the path right now is stone does the what we do some sort of outreach where the person agrees to come on a show? Stone does the initial kind of pre-interview. Uh, he’s usually on camera. He hands it off to me. I do the interview. That’s usually off camera. Then it goes back to stone. They agree to a follow up to see how best to leverage the content and how to get the most out of their interview experience. And that goes back to stone. And that’s in on camera interaction. And then from there, if it turned into, uh, a deeper conversation, whether they wanted to do this or not. And we could use Trisha as the example of how it could work then, because Trisha went through all of those steps, she I believe she had the pre-interview with Stone. She had the interview with me off camera. Then she went back with a post interview with Stone. And then at some point we all three, um, had an interaction and Trisha is usually on camera. So I would imagine she was on camera. I would imagine Stone was on camera. And to date Trisha and I have never been on. She’s been on camera, she has never seen me on camera.

James Castleberry: So I find this so fascinating that, uh, both Stone, you and Lee, you talk about how that engagement together was so very successful, uh, before Covid and then Covid changed the way that we all communicate. Um, so, uh, I wonder and, and some of coaching is experimenting to see if we can grow, if we can develop in certain areas. Um, could y’all see a way that if you went back to that methodology virtually that was so successful, uh, for you doing it together in the studio that it might have an impact?

Lee Kantor: Yeah. I mean, we’re open to trying lots of things so that we’re definitely open to that. And what would be your recommendation of of when to insert both of us together into the process?

James Castleberry: Well, my recommendation, I guess, would be what’s worked for y’all in the past. And and Lee, we talked a little bit about, um, knowing success from the past. And Stone, we talked about some of your, uh, your strengths in communication and optimism and, um, and then um, and problem solving and so that there’s a reason that y’all work together. Uh, there’s a, there’s a reason that for so long, it worked together, even in the studio, it’s even more challenging. And we’ve acknowledged that it’s even more challenging communicating virtually. So rather than it be sequential being a new process that started out of Covid, would there be a possibility that combining it again, but doing it virtually might have the same impact?

Lee Kantor: I mean, we’re up for trying it virtually. I just don’t I’m having trouble figuring out how to do that. So I don’t have an answer on, um, Um. Do we do it together at every step? Do we do it together at a certain step? At one point, then it becomes together, um, because we’re no longer in the same place. So we’re all we’re at different points in our lives and with our efforts here. So. And before we would cut, both of us come into a studio physically together. And we haven’t done that in, I don’t even know how many years, seven years. It’s been over well over five years.

Stone Payton: Right.

Lee Kantor: Um, so I, I’m just having a hard time coming up with a system that does that in, uh. So that’s where I’m. I’m looking for what you your recommendations are on a way to even test it.

James Castleberry: Yeah. So so I think it would be. I think it would be no different. I think you would do the, the initial calls because there’s such value of you guys participating together, the the systematic thinking that you do. Uh, the problem solving that you do, Stone, and that combined interaction with a person, even for a discovery call, I think. And that’s no different than how they used to meet you in the studio first.

Lee Kantor: Well, it is different because that’s not how the process in the studio was in the studio. They would get invited to a show, then they would come into the studio to have the interview experience, and that was together. So they we didn’t have a pre-call in the studio. The the show was where we first met them so that they would come in and maybe a few minutes we’d do a little mic check and just get started. And then after that we would sometimes, uh, kind of organically. It would just lead to them having questions and then us being able to either answer them right there on the spot or schedule a follow up.

James Castleberry: Okay. No thank you. That’s helpful. So so stone drawn on your problem solving, seeing this and knowing that we’re facing kind of this virtual challenge right now in scaling and in scaling visibility will be important. Personal connection will be important. I had the opportunity to be a program manager for 100% remote AI company. So you had a lot of people in that company that were, uh, more introverted. They were coders. And then you had some that were in business development that were more extroverted, and they were outgoing. Uh, but they did have a kind of a battle rhythm schedule where we’d get together and we’d talk to folks and, and so I guess, I guess what I’m wondering is, um, in this virtual environment, how can we we use the strengths that you both have, uh, to look at this challenge of, of the same, uh, getting the same results out of our virtual meetings that you guys had in the, in the, in studio meetings.

Stone Payton: No, it’s a great set of questions. I will say that the the pre-call conducted by me individually certainly isn’t, um, keeping anybody from wanting to come on air. Um, and they would come on air even if we didn’t do the pre-call. But it is a marvelous relationship building moment. But there’s also this set of logistical questions or concerns about, oh, now, is Lee going to have to get involved in all the pre calls? But I’m wondering at this point of the conversation, can we kind of keep that in place. Stone has that pre call. Then they get the interview with Lee. But if once the conversation reaches the point where they are interested in hearing more about what we do, um, and and and even maybe even on the ones that just overtly express. Yeah. I’d like to at least get some input on how to get the most out of the interview that I did. So, you know, in that post interview call, if maybe a place to test this a little bit is once they get to a certain point in the process, bring Lee in and maybe even see if we can get Lee to come on camera, but at least bring him in to to that spot. That’s where my mind is at the moment.

James Castleberry: Yeah, I think I think that that leads to that, um, improving with the interpersonal communication. I think that it helps that visibility helps with trust. Um, that, that, uh, that maybe a little bit of personal connection, sharing a little bit of something. Um, you know, I didn’t learn about your family reunions or anything, stone, but I did find out a little bit about what you were doing, and I think that creates that that comfort level. And I think that builds a little psychological safety and trust. And so, um, in this, in the way that it’s being done sequentially. It sounds a little bit maybe like a job interview, right, where you’re screened by the HR person, and then you go to the the job interview and you meet with the hiring manager. Um, do you all think that there and you mentioned it a little bit stone, but do you think that there could be value? And I know that we have to, uh, conserve time. So maybe it’s a, a 15 to 30 minute call versus an hour call for, for both of y’all. But could there be value in y’all doing some of that together so that we can start working toward building that, that trust, that psychological safety, uh, in, in interpersonal relationships from the beginning?

Stone Payton: I mean, yeah, I mean, maybe I’m a little skeptical about it and a little reluctant to to jump on it with all fours just because of the time commitment, the dynamic. If I know I can get them with me and I can get them with Lee. And if I can adjust something about what we do when I’m with them and adjust something with them, when Lee’s with them and then and I guess it doesn’t completely bother me that it’s a little bit like a job interview if if what I’m doing is trying to bring them through a process and to some degree vet them as a candidate to be a studio partner. But I’m just so I’m a little reluctant and skeptical candidly, about getting Lee and I, both of us in the process all the way through. But I can see me doing something better and more in my conversation with them. Lee doing something better and more. Maybe when he does the interview, maybe he spends a little more time up front doing some of that rapport building, and then from there forward, if it’s someone we want, if it’s not someone we want to pursue as a studio partner, then I say put them through the regular process. But if it’s someone that we want to pursue as a studio partner, then, then maybe that call is definitely Leanne Stone with him. But maybe I’m being too resistant to your idea, I don’t know.

James Castleberry: No, no, no, Stone, I hear what you’re saying. And it’s about time management and and, uh, work life harmony. I totally get that. Um, but I also hear, uh, a little bit, uh, excitement about how, um, there may be ways to to make it a little bit more personal, to share a little bit more for for both y’all in other parts of the process that that might work. Um, Lee, can can you, uh, can you share a way that that that might be possible? Uh.

Lee Kantor: I don’t know. I’m the more we’re talking about it, I don’t see where the. I don’t think the problem thus far in the system, our system that we’re doing with Stone having the pre-call me doing the interview, stone having a post call that has Generated quite a few conversations with people of which none of them have have bought anything. So I’m very aware that it’s not working to the finish line, but I just can’t. I don’t know if the reason that’s the case is that because I’m not on camera with them? I mean, I’m not. I’m open to that might be a possibility and I’m willing to test that as a possibility, but I just don’t see thus far what we’ve been doing that that is the reason that they haven’t gone all the way to the finish line.

James Castleberry: Um, yeah. And I and I and I’m not saying that that is the reason I’m saying that. That’s one of the ways to build trust, right? I don’t want y’all to take that from that, y’all. Y’all have been successful. The challenge is getting to that that finish line. We’ve got these discovery calls from Stone afterwards. I’ve heard you say, uh, Lee and the other interviews that you want to get, uh, more knows the discovery calls are probably trying to figure out, um, you know, why we got the. No. And so I’m trying to help you all figure out a way that, um, we could use both your strengths and challenges that we learn in emotional intelligence, uh, to to try to get that close that you’re seeking.

Lee Kantor: Well, I mean, an area that I. That has come up that I think that I would like your opinion on as an EQ expert is that somebody mentioned to us that when, uh, when a potential buyer shares with us a level of enthusiasm and also skepticism, that we tend to focus more on the skepticism and less on the enthusiasm just because Stone and I are both from a sales and marketing background that we’re trying to, you know, eliminate objections and manage objections. So when we’re getting a combination of enthusiasm with skepticism, we have to be able to read those signals better and have better, um, a better way to move them more towards the enthusiasm side and maybe focus less on the skepticism side. So I’d like to get your thoughts on how to better read those signals and to deal with those signals to help move the prospect forward.

James Castleberry: Okay, so I think, I think this is one place where you think, uh, Lee, more systematically and, um, Stone’s going to come at this with a lot of positivity and problem solving, too. And so, um, you know, I would try to look at the trends that that you’re hearing in those calls and, and the direction that the call took. So do they talk to you about those, um, those things that they are in agreement on the things that they’re excited about? Um, and, and, and can those be used to help with those things that they’re skeptical about? And instead of diving right into the problem solving on what? Skeptical, um, are there ways that you can build on those things that are positive that might help them overcome the skepticism?

Stone Payton: We’re not on video, so you can’t see me grinning. But, um, in my in my as I continue to gray a little bit, I’m finally getting I’m finally learning that when Holly expresses my wife’s name is Holly, when she expresses frustration with something or something’s not quite going her way a what came out and was articulated as a strength. Optimism for me, obviously, apparently can really be a real weakness. So that combined with me jumping in and trying to solve the problem when all she really wants is somebody to shut up and listen, I’m thinking there’s probably some business application for some of that too, huh?

James Castleberry: No, no. Absolutely, absolutely. And you know, it’s sometimes it’s that Brene Brown helps us with a different sense of sympathy and empathy. And a lot of times, people that are low in empathy and they’re, they’re higher in optimism, optimism to the to the effect that may be impacting reality, testing that, um, we’ll find that they’re highly sympathetic. Oh, man, that’s really bad. Yeah. That’s bad. And then if you mix that with high problem solving, you want to go help them solve that problem when really they just kind of want to want you to sit there and feel it with them. And uh, and to kind of go through it with them a little bit, you know, rather than saying, uh oh, that’s pretty bad down there. Crawl down in the hole with them and sit a while, you know.

Stone Payton: Well, and those are my outliers, right. That was my most positive, highest score was optimism. And my lowest was empathy. And, um, and so no, this is very this is very helpful.

James Castleberry: Yeah. So, so so for you, Stan. What what happens with your optimism is that as soon as you do listen and they start coming up with their own solutions, now you’ve got problem solving and optimism to work with. Right, right. But but it’s first that that listening. Um, and and so yeah I think how do we take those, those strengths uh, how do we take the, the systematic way um, to more to Lee’s question of of about how, um, um, how do we not focus so much on, uh, the things that are skeptical about, uh, to the point that, um, maybe that becomes more of the conversation than what they’re excited about. And so, you know, maybe validate those things that they’re excited about. Could you see how how, you know, we could use some of the same things that you’re talking about with Holly Stone? Um, in this area where we’re listening to those challenges and we validate those things and maybe ask questions about, um, could some of those things, if we’re talking business, could some of those things that they’re so excited about, how could we use those things, uh, to help them overcome some of those things are more skeptical about.

Stone Payton: Yeah. And at a tactical level, what kind of questions can I ask or prompts can I deliver that will get them talking about what they’re excited about, as opposed to only what they’re skeptical about?

James Castleberry: Yeah. And then and then let them get to that conclusion. So you say, okay, so you’re so excited about this. So how, um, how would you feel better about these other things, uh, and balance that with what you’re excited about here. They’re gonna solve their own problem. And it might be something that you could jump on and go with to get them to the close.

Stone Payton: Right. Yeah.

James Castleberry: Lee, what do you think about that?

Lee Kantor: Uh, I’m on board. I think that that makes a lot of sense and that. I think there’s definitely a place for using emotional intelligence in these types of closing conversations. So, um. Yeah, I’m on board.

James Castleberry: Yeah. So I think, you know, you each have individual goals, uh, that came, uh, from our conversations. And so if you think about those goals, you think about the accountability of those. Um, are there ways in the business that you could use, uh, those goals, uh, together, uh, to move forward, to move from the discussion where we’re not focusing as much on. Let me just ask you the question as to tell you, how could you use the goals that we set for both of you, uh, to move that, that, um, that challenge forward where the focus is not as much on, um, problem solving for them, but working with them in their strengths.

Stone Payton: I don’t know that I have the answer for that, but I think we need to find the answer for that. And and it could be as simple as now that Lee and I have this, um, yeah, it’s always helpful to have, like, a common language, right? Like a common nomenclature. So we know what to call some things, and we know a couple of the, um, the things that were surfaced through going through the assessment and the debrief with you. So there’s always power in this, uh, this accountability partner kind of thing. Um, and to try to keep each other in check on that or at least, at least bring that up, um, but also working hard in all of our messaging and all of that stuff to take the best of, of both of what we bring to the table and get it folded into those communications. I’m thinking.

James Castleberry: Yeah, I heard in another interview that y’all were talking about the the frequent writing and, uh, and then putting things in people’s, um, inboxes as, as quickly as possible. Um, uh, what what what is the greatest strength that you guys bring together, uh, to a client that they may not see in just the writing?

Lee Kantor: I think part of, um, what we bring to a client or a prospect together is that both John and I have similar values, but we both have a different kind of way about going about things. So it’s like you mentioned it, stone has a level of optimism, and he has a really, um, kind of enthusiastic personality. And all of that comes across where I’m more quiet and I’m more introspective, but I’m also good at analyzing things and maybe seeing things that neither one of them saw. So together, it’s pretty powerful when, um, we’re both together with somebody and they have an issue and we’re able to really tag team and get to the heart of the issue that maybe they didn’t see, or a way to achieve the outcome that they hadn’t thought about before. So they can get on board pretty quickly because we’re seeing it through two different lenses and together it becomes very powerful.

James Castleberry: Yeah. So but right now, what I think I’m hearing from y’all is that those strengths that you have, and even the way you balance one another because, you know, it’s like my wife, uh, my, uh, as an analogy, um, I, I things get blurry far away. Uh, for her, it’s hard for her to read, uh, the ingredients on a bottle that’s close to her. I said. So, you know, between the both of us, we’ve got one person that has perfect eyesight. So in this business, I think y’all balance really, really well based on what I see in your results and what we’ve talked about. Um, and so, uh, do you think that you could see value in, um, in when you’re both having this conversation with someone that you may be bringing on board. And this will this will be even more important as you, as you scale is to, uh, to focus in rather than the problem solving in those, those areas. Look at what they’re enthusiastic about. Look at what they’re positive about, what they enjoy about it, and then talk to them. Uh, because y’all can both problem solve together, bouncing off of one another with, uh, with a client. But think about how that stuff can be, um, uh, how they may be able to use. And sometimes maybe y’all go into the coaching mode that you both can do in business. Really well, go into the coaching mode there of asking them, well, these things that you enjoy, how can we use that to overcome some of some of these challenges that that you’ve brought up? Is there a way that you can see how we can overcome some of these challenges that you’re bringing up?

Stone Payton: I do think there’s power in that. And then I also just wrote down, and this is beginning to address my logistics, my skepticism and all that or my hesitation around logistics. We have this process with the with me doing the Pre-call lead, doing the interview, me doing the the post interview call. And it is overtly framed and always includes helping them use things that we have seen and done over the last 21 plus years. On how to fully leverage the fact that you’ve invested the time and energy to do the interview. And then there’s there in some of those conversations, there has been from me, um, opening up the conversation about exploring the idea of being a studio partner, you know, in Pittsburgh or San Diego or whatever. And now what I’m thinking is the if it’s someone that I really think should explore, that I should tell them that give them like the the easy next step, but then the next step is this fourth step that we don’t have built in officially. And that is a conversation with with me and Lee and the person so that we get to bring everything you’re describing. We get to actually bring it into the equation. And that is worth Lee’s time and my time together. To have that, to have a conversation in that fourth step, is that make sense?

James Castleberry: Perfect sense for me. What do you think, Lee?

Lee Kantor: Um, I think a way to address that might be maybe when you’re doing that, call the third step. Write the follow up. Yeah. Is that I am. You only do it when I’m available so that you can say, you know what? Let’s call Lee. And and it’s just part of that system in terms of I’m available. So like I’m booking myself for that call, and I’m available if needed so that I can jump on the call immediately. So it looks like it’s a hey, that’d be great if we got Lee’s input. And then you’re like, let me text him. And then I jump on the call so it doesn’t turn into a fourth. Let’s logistically, you know, try to schedule a fourth conversation. It just becomes part of the third conversation.

James Castleberry: So I love that. And I’ll tell you why. And then I’ll get both your thoughts on it. But I love that because part of building trust is that visibility and that availability. And you guys are partners supporting this new client and and them knowing it’s sort of like having an open door policy that you can use in real time.

Stone Payton: And choose not to use if, if, if.

James Castleberry: Circumstances don’t if you don’t need.

Stone Payton: It. Right, right, right right, right. Okay.

James Castleberry: What do you think.

Stone Payton: Well, at first I was.

Lee Kantor: I well I think it’s about trying to shrink this, like like you said, um, uh, James, about the. This feels like an inner. Now, I got to go to a fourth conversation with these people, like I, you know, I just was on a show, like, what’s happening here? So if they’ve already agreed to three, let’s see if we how much stuff we can squeeze in those three. Um, and this might be the thing that puts him over the edge because to your point about this shows how important this is. We’re demonstrating. Oh, this is important. I’m going to call my partner. He’s going to jump on the phone right now on camera, uh, to, uh, you know, continue this conversation that is elevating the importance and demonstrating that we’re, you know, delivering on what we’re promising. I.

James Castleberry: I think I think toward building trust. Y’all see how that can be? If it was you and you were about to join with someone and you’re having a conversation? You said. And someone just tells you, well, let me get him on the phone. And, uh, and, you know, this is important to to all of us. So. So let me get on as far as your trust, as far as your personal connection with the people that you’re about to go into business with. Uh, how do you think that would feel for you?

Stone Payton: Well, now that we’ve talked it through, I feel like I think it would feel good when when when the idea first surfaced a few moments ago, it felt a little bit like, um, a little bit of trickery or subterfuge or like, misdirection. But it’s not if legitimately Lee is scheduled for that time. And at some point in the conversation, based on the conversation, I make the decision to bring Lee in, you know? So so I’m feeling better about it now. Yeah.

Lee Kantor: How would you feel, James, if that happened? It.

James Castleberry: No. So so I think, you know, I think I’d feel good about it. I think I’d be like, okay, they’re dedicated. They’re working with me. We’re problem solving together. Uh, you’re already starting to team at that moment. Uh, and you’re demonstrating, uh, again, in a virtual environment, it’s more difficult. And so, you know, I’m studying some of the cues that are different in a virtual environment because you can’t feel that emotion like you can in person. You can’t feel that a person is at ease, you can’t feel tension if something’s going the wrong way. But virtually, with that type of availability, well, let’s hop on a call. Let’s bring so and so in. We’re on the camera. Hey, I’m happy to help. What’s going on, guys? Um, that type of openness, that type of availability that that helps with trust, that helps with psychological safety, that helps build a team.

Lee Kantor: I mean, it’s definitely an experiment we should pursue. Yeah, I don’t see a negative of of trying this for the next handful.

Stone Payton: I don’t either, and we could do it in such a way that the it could be a calendar that is specifically for that type of call. It could be tied to your availability and mine. And then you would know because it’s on that colored calendar, you know, in your calendar it’s colored orange or something, whatever. And then you know that that you’re there doing your all your stuff. You always do. And I can text you and say, hey, join this call. And then other times I won’t text and you’ll be doing whatever, you know, um, back office stuff you’d be doing during that time anyway, right?

Lee Kantor: Right.

James Castleberry: And then some of it, uh, so so I think what I hear y’all saying is that it’s worth trying. I think, Lee, it goes right along with what you’ve said before about, um, getting to the nose because from each. No, it’s not as useful if you don’t learn anything. You know that sociology teaches us that, uh, it’s faster to the production line. If you bust a hundred, uh, cups or pots than it is to try to make the perfect one. And so that’s where we get this idea about hearing nos. Um, but from every pot that we break, we need to understand why it didn’t work for us. And so I think things like this, in learning from those nos, uh, and in, in building more interpersonal relationships, virtually being visible, um, being responsive, um, and coming at it from a, okay, this is what you’re really happy about, about the business. And so how can we use those things to make you more comfortable with those things that you might be more skeptical about in a, in an approach?

Lee Kantor: Yeah. I’m I’m with you. I think this is definitely, Um. Um, a great next thing to experiment on.

James Castleberry: And I know this is this is not. And I know that, um, your systematic thinkers, one of you is a very systematic thinker. One of you is a big problem solver, but you both are high in optimism. And so you can be optimistic about trying the process, but also skeptical of of making a change to a process that you believe is working. Um, but what I think I’ve heard is that some of the challenges is not getting to closing.

Lee Kantor: I mean, I think some of our challenge is that we’re not in front of enough people, and the people that we have thus far are not evangelizing enough. So we’re not choosing the right people to be evangelists, and we’re not getting the volume of people to know about what we’re doing. That combination, I think, is what’s, um, kind of slowing down our growth to 100.

James Castleberry: Okay. So, um, to, to get to at least, um, you know, for our conversation today to get to one, one process that that maybe you could experiment with, uh, drawing on both your strengths and, and your challenge, individual challenges to try to help the business grow, uh, especially in this virtual environment where there are some challenges, even greater challenges. What is one thing that we could, um, we could grow, develop in our process, change a little bit that that we think might, uh, might yield a different result?

Stone Payton: Well, for me, Lee’s right about the other things he said. But within the context of this particular conversation, to me, an actionable set of steps is to is to rework the way we do Three relationship building moment three that that post-interview call where it’s tied to a calendar, where Lee’s going to be doing office work or whatever anyway, he’s going to and and I may even say something in my pre-call we’ll see. I might adjust that a little bit, but in that call and then make it where it’s organic, perfectly appropriate when it’s when it makes sense to bring Lee into that conversation. If it starts to go down, you know the desired path with somebody we think we might want to work with.

James Castleberry: Yeah, even the name of the call was relationship building. Right. And so this is where drawing on that, that interpersonal relationship, um, and, and then building trust virtually by being available, being visible, uh, anything that we could do that would contribute to that when, when you get, um, a hint of and I’ll ask this question and I’ll continue a thought. Did you all share your results with one another? Did you want to?

Stone Payton: We did like, vaguely, but like I didn’t send him my report. I don’t think he didn’t send me his. But we we talked about it a little bit like the high, the high points. And we probably will put it, put them both in a shared folder. But no we really hadn’t.

James Castleberry: Okay. So so if you’re thinking about targeting that rbm3, uh, and the first two words are relationship building, think about your emotional intelligence results and what you’re both strong at and where you both may have challenges so that y’all can leverage that with this client. That may have questions.

Stone Payton: Right. And again, some of that, yes, we should definitely put some planning and forethought in it. And based on our history together, especially in the olden days when we were together in a studio, uh, some of that might be a little bit like riding a bike. We, we, we were able to do that pretty darn effectively back in the day, weren’t we?

Lee Kantor: Yeah, I mean, that’s one of I think the thing that makes us a good team is that we complement our strengths and weaknesses.

James Castleberry: So I definitely see that. I could see that, y’all. Uh, as far as, uh, business partners, as far as going forward, I can see the balance. And, you know, we talked about achieving balance, being what was most important. And so if you put both of your, uh, reports together, y’all achieve a great deal of balance here. Um, like my wife and I, you know, having perfect sight, you know, mine being, uh, farther away, hers being shorter. Uh, and so this could be a part of the business that that, uh, that could, could take you farther. Um, and, uh, just by doing what you used to do, uh, and do. Well, and that you actually enjoyed, y’all. Yeah, yeah. What do you think?

Stone Payton: I like.

Lee Kantor: It. Yeah, I think it’s definitely, um, a great outcome for this call. And thank you so much for being part of it. And, James, if somebody wants to learn more about your practice or, um, do you have a website, is there a best way to connect?

James Castleberry: Yeah, it’s really simple. Uh, it’s a leader e a emotional intelligence is AI, but the website is leader e.com, and all of my information is there. We, uh, we help, uh, businesses, uh, we do team workshops, we do executive coaching. And I’m also able to certify people in emotional intelligence tools.

Stone Payton: Well, James, you have definitely lived up to your advance press. Man, thank you so much for investing the time and energy to work with us. I’m sure we’ll get a chance to talk quite a bit more, but, uh, we can’t thank you enough. Man, this has been fantastic.

James Castleberry: No, no, thank you for having me. I sure appreciate being here. And I know, uh, I can tell already that the, uh, the wheels are turning and how y’all might be able to, uh, at least go after this. Uh, rbm3 goal. I can’t wait to hear how it works out.

Stone Payton: Well, we will definitely keep you posted, man. Thanks again.

Speaker1: Thanks for listening to Scaling in Public the next Business RadioX 100 markets. Are you ready to enjoy a steady stream of discovery calls? And finally, stop being a best kept secret? It’s time to step out of the shadows and watch your coaching business grow. Let’s fill your calendar ten discovery calls in a month, guaranteed. Go to Birr to download the free Business RadioX playbook.

Breaking the Chains: Revolutionizing Addiction Treatment for a Healthier Tomorrow

February 24, 2026 by angishields

ALR-NAATP-Feature
Association Leadership Radio
Breaking the Chains: Revolutionizing Addiction Treatment for a Healthier Tomorrow
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

In this episode of Association Leadership Radio, Lee Kantor interviews Marvin Ventrell, CEO of the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers (NAATP). Marvin discusses NAATP’s 47-year history, its mission to support and professionalize addiction treatment, and the evolving landscape of the field. Topics include the medical nature of addiction, industry growth, the impact of insurance reforms, regulatory standards, and ongoing challenges such as stigma and funding. Marvin also highlights NAATP’s advocacy, educational resources, and efforts to ensure quality care, encouraging listeners to access trusted treatment through accredited providers.

NAATP Logo

Marvin-VentrellMarvin Ventrell was named CEO of the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers (NAATP) in 2015, continuing his decades long year career as a practicing attorney, professor, professional association director, and addiction treatment executive.

Mr. Ventrell’s career has been devoted to advocating for populations in need and building legal and health care system responses to meet those needs. In addition to serving in executive leadership roles in several national social welfare and justice agencies, he has authored two textbooks on law and social justice, book chapters and peer reviewed articles on law, medicine, social services, behavioral health, and addiction treatment and recovery.

He is a frequent commentator in the national media and lecturer at treatment programs, conferences, universities, and agencies.

Prior to joining NAATP, Mr. Ventrell served as Program Director at Harmony Foundation and as a consultant to CeDAR at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, both Colorado based addiction treatment programs.

He testified before the United States Congress and has served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. He is the recipient of numerous distinctions including the American Bar Association National Advocacy Award, the National Council of Juvenile Court Judges Meritorious Service Award, the University of Colorado School of Medicine Kempe Award, and the Ashley Innovator Award given for impact in the field of recovery through innovation, commitment, and dynamic thinking.

Mr. Ventrell’s focus while leading NAATP has been to secure the place of addiction treatment in health care through the establishment of treatment program ethics, professionalism, integrity, and evidence-based efficacy.

NAATP, founded in 1978, is professional membership association of addiction treatment providers whose mission is to provide leadership, advocacy, training, and member support services to ensure the equitable availability and highest quality of addiction treatment.

NAATP has prospered under Mr. Ventrell’s leadership and in 2020, the association created the Foundation for Recovery Science and Education (FoRSE), an unprecedented effort to collect and measure patient treatment characteristics and outcomes on a global scale.

Follow NAATP on LinkedIn.

Episode Highlights

  • Overview of the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers (NAATP) and its history.
  • The mission and role of NAATP in supporting addiction treatment providers.
  • Evolution of addiction treatment practices over the past 47 years.
  • Types of addictions addressed in treatment, including substance and process addictions.
  • The impact of the opioid crisis and the ongoing prevalence of alcohol-related issues.
  • Business models of addiction treatment providers, including non-profit and for-profit structures.
  • Trends in consolidation within the addiction treatment industry.
  • Standards and regulations in addiction treatment and the importance of accreditation.
  • Financial challenges faced by treatment providers and the significance of fair reimbursement rates.
  • Efforts to reduce stigma surrounding addiction and improve public understanding of addiction as a disease.

Transcript-iconThis transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix.

 

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: Broadcasting live from the Business RadioX studios in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s time for Association Leadership Radio. Now, here’s your host.

Lee Kantor: Lee Kantor. Here, another episode of Association Leadership Radio. And this is going to be a good one. Today on the show, we have the CEO of the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers, Marvin Ventrell. Welcome.

Marvin Ventrell: Thank you. Lee. Glad to be here.

Lee Kantor: Well, I’m excited to learn about your association. Tell us about the NAATP. How you serving folks?

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah, well, we’ve been serving them for 47 years. I just finished before we jumped on a letter to our members thanking them for 47 years of service. So what NAATP is the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers is our country’s professional membership society and trade association for treatment programs. So our members, thousands of them across the country, are sometimes referred to as rehab, although I don’t love that term because it really doesn’t mean much because really what treatment providers are is healthcare. Addiction is a disease. But we, uh, for now, for 47 years, have been serving, uh, those folks, helping them be successful, helping them improve their practice, helping them be visible and ultimately helping people recover from the deadly disease of addiction.

Lee Kantor: So can you talk about 47 years ago, how did this even come about? What was kind of the genesis of it?

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah, yeah. Well, it’s very different marketplace now than it was 47 years ago. You know, we we exist as a substance use disorder is the technically appropriate and medical term for addiction. Addiction has kind of a pejorative, kind of a negative sound to it. We use it all the time. In fact, it’s in our name. But sud substance use disorder is really the medical term. It’s a disease centered in the brain with biological, psychological and social manifestations as how we talk about it in, in medicine and in social science. So these days we deliver health care. But in 1978, when we were founded, addiction treatment was really still in its infancy. You know, we had some programs like Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, and there were a handful of treatment providers around the country who were doing this work and wisely said, let’s not do this independently of one another. Let’s come together, share our best practices, and increase the proliferation of of treatment centers in the country. There are there are there are millions of people suffering from the disease. And everybody will benefit if we come together as a trade association and society. So I believe, and I think there’s plenty of evidence to back this up, that professions need professional societies. I’m a lawyer also. Right. So lawyers have have the American Bar Association and its various tenants. Doctors have the American Medical Association engineers, accountants have professional societies. These professional societies are the glue that hold a profession together, support it as a whole, increase its importance and let the public know how valuable these services are. So. So that’s, uh, that’s what happened. A handful of of people who were running treatment centers said, let’s get together. And they had a meeting in California and formed the association with, you know, a few dozen members. Um, and we’ve been growing ever since.

Lee Kantor: Now, were the original addictions that were being treated. Were they ever alcohol or was alcohol kind of seen as something separate than than the drugs or the the afflictions that you’re dealing with or we’re dealing with then and now.

Marvin Ventrell: No. Well, you know, if there’s one constant in addiction or substance use disorder, it’s alcohol. So in those days it was primarily alcohol. We, you know, we treatment was thought of primarily as treatment for alcoholism. And, um, but there were other substances. Drugs have been around for a long time, you know, all kinds of drugs, um, benzodiazepines, uh, stimulants, heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine. You know, these kinds of drugs have been around. Well, meth came later, but these kinds of drugs have always been around. But but predominantly in the early days, it was treatment for alcoholism. Now. I mean, the country knows about the opioid crisis, which has, uh, killed millions of, of Americans. And, um, it became a national crisis. But I’ll tell you, even though it is imperative that we address it and other drugs. Alcohol remains the biggest killer. People don’t know that. But ultimately, the the the substance that harms Americans the most is alcohol. And um, and so, you know, I always try to make that point. Alcohol is a painful alcohol disorder is a painful disease. It kills you slowly. It makes you sick slowly. It kills you slowly. That’s very different than the lethality of a drug, like, uh, like heroin, um, which can kill you in one bad use. So, you know, all our work treatment centers deal with all of it, and we call it, you know, these are, uh, co-morbid substances, poly substances. Most people who come to treatment Lee are not one thing. They typically have an alcohol disorder, but they also typically have another drug that is harming them. And and more frequently than not these days it is an opioid. Um, so yeah.

Lee Kantor: Now, when it comes to addiction, you also include like gambling addiction or sex addiction that don’t really, uh, tie itself to a substance.

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah. I mean, that’s a really good question. And it depends on the treatment program. Treatment programs need to be good at what they do. So when you look at our membership, for example, at Net-A-Porter, you’ll find this, uh, directory, it’s called the ID, the addiction industry directory. And it will list all of the treatment providers, the treatment providers around the country. And it will indicate what they, what they, what they, uh, cover. So you will have programs that that are just focused on alcohol use. Um, most programs will will focus on most of the dangerous substances. But some of our programs, in fact, many of our programs also, um, focus, um, on what we call the process disorders, because they are addictive by nature and they’re, they’re included as, as as addictive disorders in the DSM. That’s the manual that mental health uses to diagnose things. And so gambling and sex addiction absolutely are at the top of those lists. Um, and gambling has proliferated since um, sports gambling became legalized across the board. I mean, I love ESPN, I’m a sports fan. I watch it all the time, but I, you know, every five minutes there’s another ad for how to gamble on a sport. And it’s it’s, uh, it’s ruining people’s lives. I’ll just say it as plainly as that. It is ruining people’s lives. And, um, you know, uh, folks are making a lot of money from it.

Marvin Ventrell: You know, it. So you put at the end of the ad, you know, if you have a gambling problem, please, please seek help. Well, okay. That’s good. I guess it’s better to have that on there than not, but but frankly, I wish this, uh, this proliferation of gambling hadn’t happened. One of the things I like to tell people, whether it’s a process disorder or, um, a substance, the more of a harmful thing you put in front of the human population, the more harm there will be. So when there’s a proliferation of a certain drug, that drug becomes, uh, more and more dangerous. Marijuana, for example, legalized in in many places, medical marijuana legalized in almost almost all places. Um, uh, addiction, uh, marijuana psychosis has, has been significantly on the rise because of the potency of, of marijuana. And, you know, sometimes when you talk about marijuana, people are thinking, you know, this sounds like an old, um, uh, conservative sort of, um, you know, uh, uh, abnormal fear of marijuana. Look, everybody has smoked some weed in college, that kind of thing. But that’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about people, especially young brains, who get who, who don’t develop properly or later in life who become like, literally experienced marijuana psychosis. So, um, I’m not sure what I was going with all that. Lee, but but that’s, uh, that’s a piece of it as well.

Lee Kantor: Now, how do you kind of draw the lines of what addiction merits a treatment providers help like? Because you can make a case for, well, obesity and I’m addicted to junk food or I’m addicted to I mean, cigarettes, um, is a substance. Like, how do you decide what substances warrant a treatment for and what substances are just like, well, you know, you’re a human, so eat what you want, you know, sure, obesity is an issue, but you know, we’re not going to cover that. As you know, we’re not going to have treatment for that.

Marvin Ventrell: Well you know. Yeah, that’s this is a really interesting point that you bring up. So. Eating disorder is a medical disorder. It is a disorder again in the, in the DSM.

Lee Kantor: Right. But eating disorder like a bulimia or anorexia. But what about just the person that is 100 pounds overweight right.

Marvin Ventrell: Or the 15 that I can’t seem to lose for that for that matter. As you get a little older, the gut doesn’t want to go away. No. That’s right. So here’s a way to think about it. Let’s use alcohol as an example. Addiction or substance use disorder? Let’s say it that way. You know, when we just say addiction, we think, well, is a person an addict or is or is the person not an addict? As if that’s just one thing. That’s an artificial way to talk about it. What we should talk about is a continuum of disorder. So on a continuum of substance use disorder, using alcohol as an example, there are many people who have no issue with it. Right? And and never will. Now, there’s a lot of reasons for that. One of which is, is, um, an individual’s makeup. Um, for example, um, uh, diction is heritable. Uh, if, if an individual has parents who have suffered from substance use disorder, they are much more likely themselves to suffer from a substance use disorder. So there’s a lot of there’s a lot of biology in all of this. Remember I said it’s a biological, psychological and social disorder. So the brain science, you know we can literally see addiction in the brain. So part of your answer is we can literally see addiction in the brain. The choice mechanisms in the frontal lobe of of a human’s brain are interrupted, literally interrupted, so that they can’t and don’t make good choices relative to substance use. Once the addiction takes hold, takes hold. Okay, so set that aside for a second and let’s talk about this continuum.

Marvin Ventrell: Um, some people have no problem with it. Others develop a problem. Right. So, I mean, and how do you know you have a problem? Well, you don’t feel as well physically. You probably don’t feel as well emotionally. You might start experiencing some depression or anxiety. And most people will have a small substance use disorder that they can address, maybe on their own by by just good practices. That happens a lot. Maybe a little help from family members or friends, maybe seeing a therapist, right. Who can help one recover from a mild form of disorder. That is a substance use disorder. That individual probably does not need to go to residential addiction treatment at all. But on the other end of the spectrum are people who, if they continue to drink for another week, they’re going to die, right? It’s going to kill them. That person needs to go to treatment. So where in in the line of all of that, uh, do we do we fall? Well, that’s why a professional has to do a clinical assessment. There are substance use disorder. Physicians and counselors have the ability to assess an individual’s problem with drugs or alcohol, and determine the appropriate placement. There is a colleague organization of ours called Asam. That’s the American Society for Addiction Medicine. And they are the docs, and they are the docs who work in the treatment centers. And they have what are called the Asam placement criteria. And those are the the technical rules by which we determine the level of someone’s, uh, disorder and where therefore in the treatment context, to place them.

Lee Kantor: Now, you mentioned earlier that addiction’s been around forever. Um, does everybody is this just inherent in humans that everybody kind of has a drug of choice and that they could be susceptible to, you know, taking it too far and it becomes disruptive in their life, you know. Um, like you mentioned, the 15 pounds you’d like to lose, like, you know, just because you like cookies, you know, once in a while, you know, and obviously you’re not eating cookies at every meal, you know, 24 over seven. But some people may be they behave in that manner. Is that just inherent in in being human, that there is something that could we could, um, turn into an addiction if we’re, you know, if we let it or if it’s available or it’s in our face.

Marvin Ventrell: Another really good question. We’re learning more about that. So first of all, I need to stay in my own lane. I’m not a doctor or a clinician. I’m the I’m the I’m the CEO of the provider association. I know a lot about this field, but I’m not qualified to render certain kinds of opinions. But what I will tell you is that we are learning more and more through such things as gene markers that people do indeed have a propensity to become addicted to a substance. There are people who, if they, you know, uh, use cocaine once, will never be able to put it down. There are people who use cocaine once and say, I didn’t. I don’t get what all the fuss is about. I didn’t really like that. Well, it’s the same thing. I mean, let’s put it in a clinical context and assume that it’s that they used exactly the same thing at the exact same time and place. Those two individuals, uh, biology and brain chemistry, respond to that drug differently. Um, it doesn’t call for more. There are folks who, as soon as that substance is ingested, the brain calls for more. And it wants to prioritize that above calling for other things, ultimately including your own health and even caring for your your your children. You know, we say things like, how could that mother possibly, uh, choose drugs and alcohol over her child? Well, this is a horrible thing, but at some point, literally, the brain is incapable of, uh, making those choices. So, um, human beings seem for as long as, as as we have known, human and substances have been available.

Marvin Ventrell: Human beings have suffered from them. In the 19th century, think about in the 1800s and early 1900s, um, alcoholism was rampant. And by the way, people don’t know this, but cocaine was widely used in the 1800s by typically by sort of aristocratic society in America. So this is not like some crazy thing that just started in the 1960s and 70s. It’s been around for a long, for a long time. Um, but, uh, it does seem that human beings, there’s something about the human condition that makes us us tend toward the abuse of substances. About 50 million people aged 12 and over in the United States qualify or meet what we say meet the criteria for a substance use disorder. So I guess, in a layman’s way of answering your question, um, there does seem to be something in the human condition that makes us prone to to substance use disorder. But again, at the same time, some people aren’t. Most of us know folks like this. You know, you think about your your youth, your high school or your college days and you went to parties. You could almost, you know, can you think back at like, that guy was drinking a little differently than everybody else, right? That woman was drinking a little differently or using a little differently. The rest of us grew up and put it down, but some people didn’t. What’s that all about? Well, it it’s it’s about a lot of things, but it’s certainly about about their biological makeup as well.

Lee Kantor: Now, in the way that you serve your members, um, are these members, are they like, what’s the business model for a treatment? Um, provider? Like what? What is their are they going about this as the medical profession, trying to help folks or is there a business like are there franchises of this. Like what is the business around treatment?

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah. Yeah. Um, well, it’s a business and it, it exists as a for profit business. In some instances it exists as a not for profit in some instances. Historically, what you what you had like back in the 70s and mostly in the 80s were a lot of very small, typically nonprofit, um, residential treatment programs. So there would be a program that had, let’s say, 50 beds. It had a small budget, maybe of somewhere from 5 to $10 million in gross annual revenue. It was probably founded as a nonprofit 500 1C3. And it had a tiny profit margin. You know, one, two, you know, it was 4% back in the day. If you had a profit margin of 4% in this business, you were killing it. But look, if your job was simply to keep the doors open and keep good treatment coming, it wasn’t about profit sharing. That’s fine. You’re right. You just got to stay in business. But, um, as as the work continued and as it became more and more possible to to make money. This is America. This is what we do. This is capitalism. As it became more and more possible to make money by providing treatment. And there’s no reason why a for profit doesn’t provide excellent treatment. Um, uh, then the business models began to develop in much more sophisticated ways.

Marvin Ventrell: So, so these days, um, look, NAATP is a microcosm of treatment in the country. There are probably as many as 30,000 treatment programs, recovery programs of some kind that purport to do something. Well, that’s 30,000. You know, NAATP is about a thousand, right? It’s a voluntary membership association. Our members are comprised of that little small member that I talked to you about a minute ago, with $5 million all the way to our highest category, which is which is gross annual revenue in excess of 50 million. And even that pales in comparison to the large behavioral health companies that have now come along. So, um, as is typical, what has happened in this economy as it happened in other health care economies, is we have a field that has consolidated through mergers and acquisitions, and there are fewer of the little guys and more of the big guys. When you produce scale, you know, when you go from 50 beds to um, uh, 15,000 beds. When you produce that kind of scale, if run properly, there can be considerable revenue. We have seen in recent years the advent of Wall Street money, private equity has come into addiction treatment in a big way.

Marvin Ventrell: Um, there’s a couple of reasons for that. One is the Affordable Care Act, what we think of as Obamacare. The Affordable Care Act created a revenue stream for addiction treatment by making substance use disorder one of the ten essential health care benefits that must exist in policies traded on the exchange. So boom, we’ve got now we’ve got a revenue source. So if a, uh, commercial insurance, uh, payer covers addiction, uh, and trades on the market, they have to cover, uh, addiction. And according to the law, they have to cover it with parity. That is to say, uh, on par with other disorders. They can’t have special rules for addiction. So between this parity law and Affordable Care Act, there’s a revenue stream that didn’t used to exist. And so that that brings investors um, and entrepreneurs. And so we see all manner of treatment programs now that range, as I say, from these, from these small ones to large behavioral health companies. And the trend, uh, has continued toward consolidation, um, now probably going on 20 years. So, um, our association doesn’t look like it used to look, it’s not a bunch of these small providers. It’s it’s a lot more large behavioral health companies that do all kinds of things, including substance use disorder.

Lee Kantor: So now, as part of your organization, are you do you have kind of standards that have to be upheld, or is there something from that standpoint like kind of, um, a way of doing business or their do’s and don’ts. Like what is kind of because like you mentioned, it’s kind of the wild West out there to some degree.

Marvin Ventrell: Well, yeah, I think we’re taming the Wild West a bit. Addiction is, as I said, back in the 70s, it wasn’t even thought of as part of healthcare. It wasn’t generally understood that this was a this was a brain disease. But as it as it developed into healthcare, um, and it became more professionalized, you know, in the early days, it was kind of like institutionalized Alcoholics Anonymous. I should step back. Our country’s response to alcoholism, uh, that ultimately become substance use disorder, really very much begins with the good progress made by the founding of Alcoholics Anonymous in 1939 and into the 1940s. That’s a social program, right? Aa is a social program. It’s a good social program. Helps millions of people. Um, early treatment was kind of an incorporation of Alcoholics Anonymous within a residential setting. What happens from there, though? Is it professionalizes? Right. We recognize the science. We recognize pharmacology can help with all of this. And so it professionalizes into a profession that needs standards. So back to your question. The answer is yes. First of all, there are accrediting bodies. We’re not an accrediting body. We’re the professional membership society. But there are accrediting bodies. We require all of our members to be accredited by by one of the accrediting bodies.

Marvin Ventrell: The the primary accrediting bodies are to the joint what’s called the Joint Commission. And another one is called Carf CRF. And they accredit and they have standards. You can’t be accredited unless you meet certain operational standards. So their concern is primarily quality and safety. So we here at Natpe are primarily concerned with proper operations. And so we have a document called the Quality Assurance Guidebook. The Quality Assurance Guidebook, which we just published the second edition of, and it identifies the 12 core competencies of operating an addiction treatment center. Um, you know, ranging from, you know, proper workforce to, um, billing practices, um, uh, you know, ratio of, uh, patients to counselors, all of those kinds of things. So. So, yes, I would say that addiction medicine and addiction treatment has not quite gotten to the level of other, more long standing medical practices. We don’t have the rigor of, I don’t know, orthopedics or, you know, um, uh, cardiology, but we’re getting there. And, um, and folks should not go to treatment programs that don’t have that accreditation and follow things like the quality assurance standards.

Lee Kantor: So what, um, in what kind of ways are you helping your members? Like, is there, uh, chapters around the country, or do you have, uh, annual meetings? Like, in what ways are you kind of serving your membership?

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah, we don’t have chapters. You know, off and on. We’ve toyed with having local affiliates, but we just exist as a as a national, uh, entity. And we do a number of things. We have an educational program that includes frequent educational seminars. We mostly do those through webinars. These days. We have a major national conference every year. Our 47th will be in May this this year in, in, um, uh, in Florida, uh, Amelia Island, Florida. And the nation’s providers will come together for that conference and learn and share information. And we put on that meeting. So we do we have these educational programs, educational resources. Um, another thing we do is advocate for our members in the political sphere. So, um, we have a dedicated public policy advocacy component of our work, where we go to Washington and fight for programs that help treatment centers be effective and thereby help people recover from the disease. So funding is hugely important, and we always have to be advocating for for that. We also want to get our folks paid. And so the primary way in which, you know, rich people will always be able to afford treatment, they can write a check, but it’s expensive. You know, it’s a $50,000 to stay at a good treatment program for a month. And that’s that might sound like a not a lot of money, but it’s relative to health care. It’s not. Think what it would cost you to stay in the hospital for 30 days. It’s a lot more than than $50,000. I mean, a test could cost $50,000. So what we need to do is ensure that this funding streams from our public money.

Marvin Ventrell: Medicare and Medicaid continue to flow, but also and our members are mostly commercial insurance providers. Also that that commercial insurance the big the big providers, what we think of as the providers, um, the four major payers in addiction treatment and they, you know, Aetna um United uh, Optum, those, those, those folks are reimbursing treatment providers at fair rates. And that’s really a tough a tough thing because rates by and large are not adequate. And so we fight to get our members paid at the level that they ought to be paid. And we argue with the insurance, uh, payers that the better the treatment, the more you should pay. Right? We measure our work and, and um, and pay us accordingly. The there’s actually a very significant natap program that’s happening happening right now. It’s called the tick program tick. It stands for Transparency and coverage. Some years ago this is a little known piece of legislation, but some years ago, Congress passed a law that requires insurers to disclose their reimbursement rates on in a national database so that we could have transparency, understand what we’re what we’re looking at, and create appropriate competition and and quality. So all the insurers did this, but they did it in such a way that the the average person cannot possibly dissect and figure out this information. They’re what are called machine readable files. So a human can’t do it. Right. You got to have sophisticated machine readable file, um, technology. So. All right. Well then then that’s what we’re going to develop.

Marvin Ventrell: So NAATP in combination with a company called Third Horizon. Um, uh, pulled the data, uh, sorted the data. And just for the first time in 2025, we produced a report that discloses what the major national insurance companies are paying, and that is designed to democratize the field. It’s designed to create fair competition and to give the, um, give the treatment provider a fair shot at, um, uh, negotiating for good rates. If you don’t know what the it has been traditionally against the, the, um, rules to communicate your rates with another provider. Um, and in fact the, the reimbursement contracts typically prohibit that. Well, now, because of this law and our ability at NAATP And nobody else has done this, to my knowledge. To pull this data, we now give our our members the opportunity to look at this report and say, hey, this is what you’re paying us. We provide the same service as this guy across the street. How about we equalize those those those rates as opposed to it just being willy nilly? There’s a saying in our field regarding payment from an insurance company that if you’ve met one payer in one state, you’ve met one payer in one state, meaning that it is all over the board. It’s different from payer to payer, from state to state, um, even within states. Uh, and it’s very different. So it’s I would say that the payment reimbursement payment is, is more Wild West than anything still. And we need to we just need to make it fair.

Lee Kantor: Now what do you need more of? How can we help? Do you need more treatment providers that join, uh, your association? Do you need more consumers to kind of know, to go to your website or to choose one of your providers, like.

Marvin Ventrell: I would say, if you hadn’t given me those two examples, those are the two examples that I would have given you. So one of the things we want to do is help people understand that a substance use disorder, addiction is a disease. It’s not a moral failure. It’s not a failure of the will. It doesn’t make you a deficient human being. It makes you sick. And if you have diabetes, you go to the doctor. And if you have, you know, a traditional medical disorder, you seek help. And that’s the way we need to look at addiction. We talk about it as stigma. There’s so much stigma surrounding the disease that the public doesn’t seek help. Most people who need treatment don’t get treatment. Well, here, let me give you this statistic. Approximately 80% of the people who need addiction treatment don’t get it. Only 20% get it. Take diabetes. I use that as an example 80. It’s just the converse. 80% of the public who has diabetes gets diabetes treatment. So what? And why is that? A big piece of it is stigma. Um, people not seeking care. People not wanting to seek care. We say addiction is a disease that tells you you don’t have a disease. And that’s kind of true. You know, it sneaks up on people and and they don’t seek care. So we want to get rid of this stigma. Uh, we want folks to know that they can come to NAATP. Um, uh, a lot of our resources are for our members, but we also have educational materials for the public, and we have the Ade, the Addiction industry directory, which is where I would want everyone to go to find treatment.

Marvin Ventrell: Because you can’t just be in a Tap member. You have to qualify. You have to meet licensing and accreditation standards. Um, you have to follow a strict ethics code, and you aspire to the guidelines of the quality assurance guidebook that I talked about earlier. So stigma, education, all of that. Um, and then the other piece is we need to, um, elect politicians who understand that, um, we’re looking at as many as 800 people a day in this country dying from some form of addiction, and that’s unnecessary. We can treat this. And so if we fund it properly, frankly, if we get fair insurance reimbursement rates, we can, you know, we can make a proper dent in this and address it as we have other, other areas. So, um, uh, get educated, seek assistance. And if you’re an operator or you’re thinking of becoming an operator and you want to invest in this, come to us. Come to us first so that you can, you know, look, I want good providers to be members, but mostly I don’t want people to get into this work not knowing what they’re doing, because there’s too much harm that can be caused to, to the public. So, you know, um, those are the things I would stress.

Lee Kantor: So one more time, the website, if somebody wants to learn more or connect with you or somebody on the team.

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah. It’s easy. Natasha n um, and, um, you can contact our staff. We’re headquartered in Colorado. I work out of DC for for political access. Um, uh, but we’ve got lots of folks available to help, and we’re a nonprofit organization. Our job is to help people get treatment and to help that treatment be good treatment.

Lee Kantor: Well, Marvin, thank you so much for sharing your story today, doing such important work. And we appreciate you.

Marvin Ventrell: Appreciate you. Take care.

Lee Kantor: All right. This is Lee Kantor. We’ll see you all next time on Association Leadership Radio.

BRX Pro Tip: Signs Your Networking Has Become Not Working

February 24, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: Signs Your Networking Has Become Not Working
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: Networking Has Become Not Working

Stone Payton: Welcome back to Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, we have some luxuries and kind of a unique approach to this whole idea of networking, but I could see us and our people in the Business RadioX system falling into this trap too. But what are some signs that your networking may have become not working?

Lee Kantor: One of the signs that your networking isn’t paying off is that you’re meeting a lot of people, but you can’t remember their names two days later. You’re showing up to events just because you’re supposed to show up for events. You’re asking, what do you do, what do you do, what do you do, and you’re never kind of going deeper and really getting to know the people.

Lee Kantor: And the bottom line is you focus too much on quantity over quality. And real networking isn’t a competition on how many people you can meet. It’s about building relationships with the right people that can move the needle in your business and actually following through with them.

Lee Kantor: So number one, I would recommend if you’re getting into this kind of rut where you’re going to a lot of these events, you’re meeting tons of people, but you’re not really building the quality relationships that you’re hoping for, the first move to make is just cut your networking in half and double down on your follow up. I mean, the relationships are built through follow up, not by the initial meeting. So, spend less time meeting new people and more time building deeper relationships with people you’ve already met. So, I would start there.

Lee Kantor: Number two, get specific of who you’re trying to meet. Stop going to every event. Start going to the places where your ideal clients and the partners you want to interact with actually are. And number three, create value before you ask for anything. Make an introduction. Make a connection. Share an insight. Send the person something useful. Give them a reason to remember you.

Lee Kantor: And if your networking isn’t generating real conversations, real relationships, real opportunities, you have to do something different.

Lee Kantor: And then, as Stone mentioned, Business RadioX is your cheat code. If you want to be better at networking and you’re frustrated by the lack of results your networking is giving you, then definitely check out Business RadioX. Our platform is proven to help people network with the right people and deliver actual green dollar ROI.

BRX Pro Tip: The Danger of Optimizing for Super Users

February 23, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: The Danger of Optimizing for Super Users
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: The Danger of Optimizing for Super Users

Stone Payton: And we’re back with Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, it sounds a little counterintuitive, I think, but there really is some risk and maybe some danger in optimizing your products, your services, your whole approach for the super user.

Lee Kantor: Yeah, this is one of those things where your super users, big fan, they love you, they can’t get enough of you, and they ask a lot of you sometimes, sometimes they want more and more and more. Because they’re your super user, they’re your most active user, so you start kind of incrementally adding some bells and whistles for them because, you know, the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

Lee Kantor: So, they’re like always telling you it’d be great if you did this or it’d be great if you could also do this. And then, all of a sudden, your core offering is getting more and more complicated. Your core offering is getting more and more expensive. So the average person, the new person who becomes exposed of your service or your product is not thrilled with it anymore because it’s too hard. And it only works for people that have been immersed with your service or product for a period of time.

Lee Kantor: So, things to keep in mind that keep you from falling into this trap are, number one, separate out these power features from your core features. Keep your main experience simple and move more advanced offerings or stuff into an optional menu or an add-on.

Lee Kantor: And it’s important to really talk to kind of the newest customers and not just your oldest veteran customers. Understand what makes a new person come into your circle, and ask those people what it is that attracted them to this, what it is that they like. Because if you keep them happy and you have a flow of those people, then they’ll eventually become veteran people too.

Lee Kantor: So, make sure you’re talking to kind of the newbies as well as the veterans, and measure how many people are using all of these features that the power users are demanding. If it’s only a handful of people, maybe just say, sorry, we can’t do that. If barely anybody’s using it except for one client, it’s probably not useful for everybody. It’s only useful for this one individual. And don’t let that clutter up the experience for the vast majority of the other people that you’re trying to serve.

Lee Kantor: So, you want to make it easy for new people to get value fast, that’s critical, and you can always add complexity later for the people who want it. You know, if they pay for it, make it a premium offering. It doesn’t have to be part of kind of your core offering.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 1329
  • Next Page »

Business RadioX ® Network


 

Our Most Recent Episode

CONNECT WITH US

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Our Mission

We help local business leaders get the word out about the important work they’re doing to serve their market, their community, and their profession.

We support and celebrate business by sharing positive business stories that traditional media ignores. Some media leans left. Some media leans right. We lean business.

Sponsor a Show

Build Relationships and Grow Your Business. Click here for more details.

Partner With Us

Discover More Here

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy

Connect with us

Want to keep up with the latest in pro-business news across the network? Follow us on social media for the latest stories!
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Business RadioX® Headquarters
1000 Abernathy Rd. NE
Building 400, Suite L-10
Sandy Springs, GA 30328

© 2026 Business RadioX ® · Rainmaker Platform

BRXStudioCoversLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of LA Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDENVER

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Denver Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversPENSACOLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Pensacola Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversBIRMINGHAM

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Birmingham Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversTALLAHASSEE

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Tallahassee Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRALEIGH

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Raleigh Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRICHMONDNoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Richmond Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversNASHVILLENoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Nashville Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDETROIT

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Detroit Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversSTLOUIS

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of St. Louis Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCOLUMBUS-small

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Columbus Business Radio

Coachthecoach-08-08

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Coach the Coach

BRXStudioCoversBAYAREA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Bay Area Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCHICAGO

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Chicago Business Radio

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Atlanta Business Radio